LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ °øÁ¤°¡Ä¡Æò°¡¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ : Á¶±âÇà»çƯ¼ºÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÑ È®ÀåµÈ ¹Ì±¹Çü ¿É¼Ç¸ðÇü ¹× È¿¿ë±Ø´ëÈ­¸ðÇüÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

  • ±èÇö¾Æ Àü³²´ëÇб³ °æ¿µÇаú ¿¬±¸±³¼ö, BK21¨Úbiz ÄÁ¹öÀü½º »ç¾÷´Ü
  • Á¤¼ºÃ¢ Àü³²´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ ±³¼ö, BK21¨Úbiz ÄÁ¹öÀü½º »ç¾÷´Ü
ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ °øÁ¤°¡Ä¡Æò°¡´Â À繫Á¦Ç¥ÀÛ¼º½Ã ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ °øÁ¤°¡Ä¡¸¦ ºñ¿ëÈ­Çϵµ·Ï ÇÑ ±â¾÷ȸ°è±âÁØ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Áß¿äÇÑ »ç¾ÈÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀº °³ÀÎÀÇ À§ÇèȸÇǵµ¿Í ½Ç±Ç¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¶±âÇà»çÆÐÅÏÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â Á¡¿¡¼­ ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ¿É¼Ç°ú ´Ù¸£¸ç, ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¡ÀÌ °øÁ¤°¡Ä¡Æò°¡½Ã ¹Ý¿µµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇÑ ´ëÇ¥ÀûÀÎ °¡Ä¡Æò°¡¸ðÇüÀ¸·Î È¿¿ë±Ø´ëÈ­¸ðÇü(Utility-Maximazation Model; Huddart, 1994)°ú È®ÀåµÈ ¹Ì±¹Çü ¿É¼Ç¸ðÇü(Extended American Option Model; Carpenter, 1998)ÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. º» ³í¹®Àº ÀÌ µÎ ¸ðÇüÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ ½ÇÁ¦Á¸¼Ó±â°£À» °¡Àå Àß ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ Æò°¡¸ðÇüÀº ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö, ±×¸®°í À繫Á¦Ç¥ÁÖ¼®¿¡ °ø½ÃµÇ´Â ÃßÁ¤Á¸¼Ó±â°£ÀÌ ½ºÅå¿É¼ÇÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀ» Àß ¹Ý¿µÇÏ¿© »êÁ¤µÇ¾ú´ÂÁö »ìÆ캸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀûÀÎ ¸ðÇü Áß È®ÀåµÈ ¹Ì±¹Çü ¿É¼Ç¸ðÇüÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ¾î¶² ¸ðÇüº¸´Ù ´õ, ¶ÇÇÑ À繫Á¦Ç¥¿¡ Á¦½ÃµÈ ½Ç¹«ÀÚµéÀÇ ÃßÁ¤Ä¡º¸´Ù ´õ ±â´ëÁÖ°¡ºñÀ²°ú ±â´ëÁ¸¼Ó±â°£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¹Ãø·Â Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ °¡Àå Ÿ´çÇÑ ¸ðÇüÀ̶ó°í ÆǴܵǾú´Ù
ÀÓÁ÷¿ø ½ºÅå¿É¼Ç,½ºÅå¿É¼Ç °øÁ¤°¡Ä¡,È®ÀåµÈ ¹Ì±¹Çü ¿É¼Ç¸ðÇü,È¿¿ë±Ø´ëÈ­ ¸ðÇü,½ºÅå¿É¼Ç Çà»çÆÐÅÏ

The Study on the Fair Valuation of ESOs

  • Hyeon-A Kim
  • Sung-Chang Jung
Employee stock options have been the representative compensation system since they were adopted in 1997 in Korea with the change into the performance culture. Recently fair valuation of employee stock options(ESOs) has become a significant issue not only because they can measure their incentive effects but also because the Accounting Standards require ESOs value to be expensed for documenting financial statements. ESOs, which are inalienable and forfeitable, exhibit different exercise patterns from standard options. Prior researches related with empirical exercise patterns of ESOs exhibit that ESOs are prematurely exercised soon after the vesting period is over and the early exercise patterns are influenced particularly by risk aversion(Huddart and Lang, 1996; Carpenter, 1998; Bettis et al., 2005; Boyd et al., 2007). Kim and Jung (2009) analyzed the Korean ESOs and showed that stock options are exercised approximately 3.15 years after being granted, and these early exercise patterns were found to be influenced by risk aversion, profitability through exercise and firm characteristics. There are ESO valuation models reflecting these ESOs features such as extended American option model(Carpenter, 1998) and Utility-maximization model(Huddart, 1994; Kulatilaka and Marcus, 1994). The one adjusted the simple American option model by adding an exogenous parameter, ¡®stopping state¡¯, in which the employees or executives automatically exercise or forfeit the option. The other adopted the employee¡¯s utility function of CRRA(constant relative risk aversion). Employees exercise their stock options when their expected utility, influenced by their risk aversion and outside wealth as well as stopping state, is maximized. But, generally, accounting practitioner estimate the fair valuation of ESOs using just either the modified Black-Scholes model, which adjusts the option¡¯s life to the expected life and subtracts the cancelation, or typical American option model, which can be exercised prior to maturity. The aim of this study is both to look for an ESO valuation model that can best predict the actual exercise pattern. Furthermore, we are to review whether the expected life of ESOs that are currently posted on the financial statements fits the actual exercise pattern. This analysis helps us know if accounting practitioner estimate the expected life of ESOs appropriately considering the ESOs¡¯ features and the correlation between stock price and the timing of exercise. The process of analysis is like followings; First, we have to calibrate some unobserved parameters; stopping state in extended American option model and risk aversion, outside wealth, and stopping state in utility-maximization model according to the method of Carpenter (1998) and Bettis et al. (2005). To do this, we set the mean exercise pattern of sample the base exercise pattern, searching the best unobserved parameters showing the closest to the base exercise pattern through the grid-search method. Second, we calculate the expected exercise pattern of each firm using calibrated parameters(stopping state, risk aversion, outside wealth) and observed parameters of its own; volatility, dividend rate, vesting date, risk-free rate, expected return. Third, we evaluate which option model forecasts most accurately among models; modified Black-Scholes model, American option model, extended American option model, Utility-maximization model. Also we analyze whether the expected life of ESOs that is currently posted on the financial statements forecast properly by comparing the forecast error such as the mean error, the percentage error, the mean absolute error, and the square root of the mean squared percentage error, and by the regressions of the actual exercise variable on the model forecast. We analyzed a total of 159 exercised employee stock options for the years between 2000 and 2008. We limited the sample to ones that we can obtain the characteristics of stock option grant and exercise and the firm specifies the estimates of the characteristics of ESOs on the footnote of financial statement such as expected life of their own. The results are like followings; First, the analysis of 159 stock options in this study indicates that among many theoretical ESO models, the extended American option model appears to be the best valuation model in predicting the expected stock-to-strike ratio and the expected life of ESOs. This result is encouraging and practicable because extend American option model doesn¡¯t assume the risk aversion which is very difficult to observe and presume. So, we can estimate the fair valuation of ESOs without using the elaborate model such as utility-maximization model. Second, the officially posted estimate on the financial statements, on the other hand, didn¡¯t have as good a predictability as the model, and the correlation with the actual exercise period was not even close to the statistics. Consequently, proper measures should be taken in order to estimate the expected life based on the ESOs features such as early exercise and forfeiture rate in the process of fair valuation of ESOs for documenting financial statements.
ESOs,Fair Valuation of ESOs,Extended American Option Model,Utility-Maximization Model,Exercise Pattern