LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Corporate Diversification, Sales Growth, and Capital Market Development : Cross-Country Evidence

  • Taek Ho Kwon School of Business, Chungnam National University, Daejon, Korea
  • Sung C. Bae Department of Finance, College of Business, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green
  • Soon Hong Park School of Business, Chungnam National University, Daejon, Korea
This paper highlights the interactions of sales growth with diversification strategies and their joint effects on firm value. Employing firm-level data for 39 countries, we report that firms diversify mainly to cope with their poor sales growth and/or slow growth in their core industries. Consistent with evidence in the literature, we confirm a diversification discount on average for our sample firms. After considering joint changes in sales growth and diversification, however, we uncover the existence of a diversification premium in two situations: (1) when firms expand diversification with their sales growing faster than industry peers; and (2) when firms reduce diversification with declining sales. We further find that the effects of the interactions between sales growth and diversification activity on firm value are more pronounced for developed market firms than for emerging market firms. Overall, our results strongly suggest that despite the negative diversification effect on average, a diversification premium is viable if a firm¡¯s diversification strategy is properly aligned with its business situations such as sales growth.

  • Taek Ho Kwon
  • Sung C. Bae
  • Soon Hong Park
This paper highlights the interactions of sales growth with diversification strategies and their joint effects on firm value. Employing firm-level data for 39 countries, we report that firms diversify mainly to cope with their poor sales growth and/or slow growth in their core industries. Consistent with evidence in the literature, we confirm a diversification discount on average for our sample firms. After considering joint changes in sales growth and diversification, however, we uncover the existence of a diversification premium in two situations: (1) when firms expand diversification with their sales growing faster than industry peers; and (2) when firms reduce diversification with declining sales. We further find that the effects of the interactions between sales growth and diversification activity on firm value are more pronounced for developed market firms than for emerging market firms. Overall, our results strongly suggest that despite the negative diversification effect on average, a diversification premium is viable if a firm¡¯s diversification strategy is properly aligned with its business situations such as sales growth.
Sales growth,diversification type,capital market development,cross-country evidence