LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Çѱ¹ ÁֽĽÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«ÀÇ È°¿ë È¿°ú : ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý±â±ÝÀÇ ¾×Ƽºê À§Çè °ü¸® ±ÔÁ¤À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

  • °­´ëÀÏ ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¿¬±¸¿ø ¿¬±¸À§¿ø
  • ¹ÚÁ¾È£ ±¹¸³¼øõ´ëÇб³ °æ¿µÇаú, ±³¼ö
  • ¾ö°æ½Ä CRMR at UC Berkeley ¿¬±¸¿ø
º» ³í¹®Àº Çѱ¹ ÁֽĽÃÀå¿¡¼­ ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«À» ¼öÇàÇÒ °æ¿ì ¾ò°Ô µÇ´Â ¼º°ú¿Í À¯È¿¼ºÀ» ³íÀÇÇÑ´Ù. ¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ¸·Î´Â Lei and Li(2009)ÀÇ ÀϹÝÀû Àü·«(1996. 7~2016. 6. KRX »óÀåÁ¾¸ñ)°ú ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý±â±ÝÀÇ Æ¯Á¤ Àü·«(2011. 1~2017. 12. ¿ì·®Á¾¸ñ, ¡°¾×Ƽºê À§Çè °ü¸® 3´Ü°è¡± Á¶Ä¡)À» ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀ» ÅëÇØ ¸ÅÀÔº¸À¯ Àü·«°ú ºñ±³ÇÑ´Ù. ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ù°, Lei and Li(2009)ÀÇ ÀϹÝÀû ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«Àº ¼º°ú Ãø¸é¿¡¼­ ¸ÅÀÔº¸À¯ Àü·«°ú ºñ±³ÇØ ¿ì¿­À» °¡¸± ¼ö´Â ¾øÁö¸¸, À§Çè °¨¼Ò Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â º¸´Ù È¿°úÀûÀÌ´Ù. µÑ°, ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý±â±ÝÀÇ ¾×Ƽºê À§Çè °ü¸® 3´Ü°è Àü·«Àº ÇöÇàó·³ Á¦3´Ü°è ÁøÀÔ ½Ã ¼ÕÀý¸Å¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ´Â °Íº¸´Ù Á¦2´Ü°è ÁøÀÔ°ú µ¿½Ã¿¡ ´Ü±â¼öÀÍ·üÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼ºÀ» üũÇØ°¡¸ç ¼ÕÀý¸ÅÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ù¶÷Á÷ÇÏ´Ù. µÎ Àü·«ÀÇ ºÐ¼® °á°ú°¡ »óÀÌÇÑ µ¥¿¡´Â ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ǿ¡ »ç¿ëÇÑ ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·« ÀÚüÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÁÖ¿äÀÎÀ̶ó ÆǴܵȴÙ. ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«ÀÌ ½ÇÈ¿¼ºÀ» °¡Áö·Á¸é ÀϹÝÀû ¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«À» Çö½ÇÀÇ Çѱ¹ ÁֽĽÃÀå¿¡ ¾î¶»°Ô ±¸ÇöÇÏ´À³Ä°¡ °ü°ÇÀÓÀ» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.
¼ÕÀý¸Å Àü·«,¸ÅÀÔº¸À¯ Àü·«,±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý±â±Ý ¾×Ƽºê À§Çè °ü¸® 3´Ü°è,½Ã¹Ä·¹ÀÌ¼Ç ºÐ¼®

Stop-Loss Strategies and National Pension Fund Active-Risk Management in Korean Stocks

  • Daeil Kang
  • Jong-Ho Park
  • Kyong Shik Eom
A stop-loss strategy is an investment strategy that automatically sells a stock that is suffering a loss when its price reaches a stop price. It is well known that investors actively use these strategies to protect against downward risk in the face of (ultra-) short-term volatility and drastically dropping stock prices. Since a stop-loss strategy uses algorithms to determine when the stock should be sold, investors do not have to follow the market constantly. Therefore, investors can control their behavioral biases and prevent losses in advance, and in practice this strategy is generally known to be useful in improving returns on investment. However, according to Kaminski and Lo (2014), the stop-loss strategy has different effects depending on the return-generating process the stocks follow. If stock returns follow a momentum or a regime-switching process, then a stop-loss strategy can increase portfolio profits and/or reduce volatility. However, if they follow a random-walk or a mean-reverting process, then a stop-loss strategy can lower portfolio profits. This paper analyzes the performance and effectiveness of stop-loss strategies in the Korean stock market by analyzing a general stop-loss strategy and a specific stop-loss strategy. For the general stop-loss strategy, we use the one studied by Lei and Li (2009). For the specific stop-loss strategy, we use the Active Risk-Management Phase 3 of the Korea National Pension Service (NPS). We analyze the effects of the general stop-loss strategy on the stocks listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ markets from July 1996 to June 2016. We use block bootstrapping to compare the performances of the stop-loss strategy to the buy-hold strategy, and calculate the efficiency of the stop-loss strategy by calculating the stop-loss premium. To analyze the specific stop-loss strategy embedded in the NPS¡¯s Active Risk-Management Phase 3, we analyze the NPS¡¯s investment universe from January 2011 to December 2017. We compute the cumulative rate of returns after the entry of the Active Risk-Management Phase 3 under an algorithm simulation. Ever since the 2008 global financial crisis, the Korean stock market, like other leading global markets, has experienced ultra-short-term volatility and sudden liquidity droughts in the absence of any material news. Stop-loss orders are a basic risk-management tool under these circumstances. Despite these structural market conditions, the Korea Exchange (KRX) does not offer stop orders or stop-loss orders to investors. Therefore, it is important to determine whether stop-loss strategies can help control the downside risk to investors. This study also addresses how the interaction between the structural conditions of the Korean stock market and the implementation of mandatory stock trading under the risk-management rules affect the investment strategy of the NPS, which is a timely and important topic. The results of our analyses are as follows. First, in terms of performance, we cannot confirm that a general stop-loss strategy is statistically superior to a buy-hold strategy, or vice versa. However, in terms of risk management, a general stop-loss strategy is more effective at reducing volatility than a buy-hold strategy. Second, 75% of the stocks that enter Phase 1 exit and return to a normal status within fourteen trading days. Phase 1 only involves enhanced monitoring of the stock, and stop-loss orders are not applied to these. When a stock enters Phase 2, a report is generated, but no specific action is mandated. Once a stock enters Phase 3, NPS is mandated to consider placing a stop-loss order. We find that in Phase 2 it is beneficial to observe whether the stock return becomes positive or remains stable over the ensuing 2~3 months (60 trading days) or 4~5 months (120 trading days). If the return continues to be positive or stable, NPS should continue to hold the stock and not place a stop-loss order. However, if the return remains negative in Phase 2, it is desirable to sell the stock without waiting for it to enter Phase 3. If a stock enters Phase 3 and NPS still holds it, it is desirable to sell the stock and to invest the sales proceeds in safe assets, and then repurchase the stock if and when it meets the re-entry threshold. Third, as the cumulative return after entering Phase 3 is often negative for up to 240 trading days, the stop-loss strategy does not seem to hurt returns by realizing transitory losses. Any possible increase in volatility, which results from the introduction of static VI or the increase of the price limit, does not appear to adversely affect the stop-loss strategy. Fourth, we find that the general stop-loss strategy in the Korean stock market does not improve performance. However, in the case of active risk management of NPS, it is desirable to sell the stocks prior to or on entering Phase 3. The difference between the two results appears to be largely due to the differences of the specific parameters of the stop-loss strategies. In the end, the effectiveness of stop-loss strategies critically depends on matching the parameters of the strategy to the conditions in the Korean stock market.
block bootstrapping,Stop-Loss Strategy,Buy-Hold Strategy,Active Risk Management of The National Pension Service,Block Bootstrapping,Simulation Analysis