LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

Archive

State-Dependent Variations in Expected Illiquidity Premium

  • Jeewon Jang College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea,
  • Jangkoo Kang Graduate School of Finance & Accounting, College of Business, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Seoul, Korea
  • Changjun Lee College of Business Administration, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
Recent theories of state-dependent variations in market liquidity suggest strong variations in expected illiquidity premium across economic states. Adopting a two-state Markov switching model, we find that while illiquid stocks are more strongly affected by economic conditions than liquid ones during recessions, the differences in expected returns are relatively weak during expansions. As a result, the expected illiquidity premium displays strong state-dependent variations, and its countercyclical pattern is consistent with theoretical argument based on timevarying liquidity risk premium. Overall, our results provide a strong relation between the expected illiquidity premium and the real business cycle.

  • Jeewon Jang
  • Jangkoo Kang
  • Changjun Lee
Recent theories of state-dependent variations in market liquidity suggest strong variations in expected illiquidity premium across economic states. Adopting a two-state Markov switching model, we find that while illiquid stocks are more strongly affected by economic conditions than liquid ones during recessions, the differences in expected returns are relatively weak during expansions. As a result, the expected illiquidity premium displays strong state-dependent variations, and its countercyclical pattern is consistent with theoretical argument based on timevarying liquidity risk premium. Overall, our results provide a strong relation between the expected illiquidity premium and the real business cycle.
Markov switching model,Illiquidity premium,State-dependent expected returns,Business cycle variable