LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

Archive

Systemic Risk, Financial Crisis and Vulnerability of Economy

  • Yong-Cheol Kim Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 742, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0742, USA
  • Gabjin Oh Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 742, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0742, USA.
  • Hyeongsop Shim Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, PO Box 742, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0742, USA.
We develop a measure of systemic risk of network of economic sectors, both nancial and real sectors, based on symbolic transfer entropy (STE), by incorporating the strength and asymmetry of information flow and by calibrating the works of Billio and et. al. (2012). Investigating the time variation of systemic risk in the United States using size weighted index return of Fama and French 48 industries, we document that systemic risk of whole economy as well as nancial sector start to increase beginning from the year 2001 and grow continuously until it reaches a peak in 2008. In addition, we nd that systemic risk pops up during Asian and Russian currency crisis in 1998 albeit for short duration. In addition, we nd that systemic risks are closely linked to the rest of the economy. We use a battery of macro-economic variables, and show our systemic risk measure is robust with unemployment, treasury rate, return and volatility of stock index among other macro-economic variables. Interestingly, the systemic risk in 2010 remains at same high level as in nancial crisis period of 2007/2008.

  • Yong-Cheol Kim
  • Gabjin Oh
  • Hyeongsop Shim
We develop a measure of systemic risk of network of economic sectors, both nancial and real sectors, based on symbolic transfer entropy (STE), by incorporating the strength and asymmetry of information flow and by calibrating the works of Billio and et. al. (2012). Investigating the time variation of systemic risk in the United States using size weighted index return of Fama and French 48 industries, we document that systemic risk of whole economy as well as nancial sector start to increase beginning from the year 2001 and grow continuously until it reaches a peak in 2008. In addition, we nd that systemic risk pops up during Asian and Russian currency crisis in 1998 albeit for short duration. In addition, we nd that systemic risks are closely linked to the rest of the economy. We use a battery of macro-economic variables, and show our systemic risk measure is robust with unemployment, treasury rate, return and volatility of stock index among other macro-economic variables. Interestingly, the systemic risk in 2010 remains at same high level as in nancial crisis period of 2007/2008.
systemic risk,real and nancial sector interaction,contagion,information flow