LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

Archive

¹ö½º ÁØ °ø¿µÁ¦¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ : À¯ÀνýºÅÛ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­

  • ¾çä¿­ Àü³²´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ °æ¿µÇкÎ
¹ö½º ¼­ºñ½ºÀÇ °³¼±°ú ´ëÁß±³ÅëÀÇ È°¼ºÈ­¸¦ À§ÇÏ¿© 2004³â 7¿ù ¼­¿ï½Ã¸¦ ÇʵηΠÇÏ¿©, ´ë ºÎºÐÀÇ ±¤¿ª½Ã°¡ ¹ö½º ÁØ°ø¿µÁ¦¸¦ µµÀÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¹ö½º ÁØ°ø¿µÁ¦ÀÇ µµÀÔÀ¸·Î »ç¿ëÀÚÀÇ ÆíÀÍÀº Áõ´ëµÇ¾ú´Ù°í Æò°¡µÇ³ª, ¿î¼Û¼öÀÔ±Ý °ü¸®¿Í º¸Á¶±Ý »ç¿ë¿¡¼­ Åõ¸í¼º ¹®Á¦, È¿À²¼º Áõ´ë¸¦ Åë ÇÑ ¿ø°¡Àý°¨ ³ë·ÂÀÇ ºÎÁ· µîÀÌ ¹ö½º ÁØ°ø¿µÁ¦ÀÇ ¹®Á¦Á¡À¸·Î ÁöÀûµÈ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ¿î¼Û»çÀÇ ÀûÀÚ ¸¦ º¸ÀüÇØÁÖ±â À§ÇÑ ÀçÁ¤Áö¿ø±ÝÀÇ Áö¼ÓÀû Áõ´ë·Î ÀÎÇÏ¿© Áö¼Ó°¡´É¼º¿¡ Àǹ®ÀÌ Á¦±âµÇ´Â ½Ç Á¤ÀÌ´Ù. Laffont and Tirole(1993)°ú Gagnepain and Ivaldi(2002)ÀÇ ¸ðÇüÀ» ±âº»À¸·Î ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ ¹ö½º ÁØ°ø¿µÁ¦¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÌ·ÐÀû ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© °³¼±Á¡À» Á¦¾ÈÇÑ´Ù. ÇöÀçÀÇ Áö¿ø¹æ½ÄÀÎ ¡®»çÈÄ ¿ø°¡ º¸Àü ¹æ½Ä¡¯Àº È¿À²¼º Ãß±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯ÀÎÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ½Àº ¹°·Ð ¸¹Àº ÇàÁ¤ºñ¿ë °ú ºñ¸®¸¦ À¯¹ßÇÏ´Â Á÷Á¢Áö¿ø/±ÔÁ¦¹æ½ÄÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¿î¼Û»ç¿¡°Ô ÀÚÀ²¼ºÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ¿© È¿À²¼º À» Çâ»ó½ÃÅ°°í °Å½ÃÀûÀÎ ºñ¿ëÀ» °ü¸®Çϸç ÇàÁ¤ºñ¿ë°ú °ü·Ã ºñÇÕ¸®¼ºÀ» ÁÙÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¡®»çÀü Àû °íÁ¤±Ý¾× Áö¿ø ¹æ½Ä¡¯ ¶Ç´Â Áß°£´Ü°èÀÎ ¡®À¯ÀÎ º¸Á¶±Ý Á¦µµ¡¯ÀÇ µµÀÔÀ» ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô °ËÅäÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÒ Çʿ伺À» Á¦±âÇÑ´Ù.

A Study on the Bus Quasi-Public Operating System : Incentive Perspective.

  • Chae-Yeol Yang
The Bus Quasi-Public Operating System (BQPOS) was introduced to improve the bus service and to promote the public transportation in 2004 firstly in Seoul, and major metropolitan local governments followed suit. The user benefit is evaluated to have increased with the introduction of BQPOS, but there still remains many problems: the lack of transparency in transport income management which is alleged to cause the misappropriation of public subsidy, lack of effort to improve the efficiency by cutting costs. and eventually problem in sustainability of the public subsidy to compensate for the losses in bus companies. This paper analyzes BQPOS using economic model based on Laffont and Tirole(1993), and Gagnepain and Ivaldi(2002), and porposes alternative system and measures to improve the system. The current BQPOS is the 'cost-plus' scheme which does not provide any incentive to improve efficiency, causes many irregularities in the use of subsidy and creates the big burden of administration costs. This paper proposes 'ex-ante fixed lump sum scheme' and intermediate 'linear contract scheme' which will incentivise the managements of the bus companies, and reduce the administration costs and irregularities.
Bus Quasi-Public Operating System (BQPOS),incentice,subsidy,'cost-plus' scheme,ex-ante fixed lump sum scheme'