LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Is Accounting Information Quality Priced in Korea?

  • Ok-Hwa Ahan Korea University Business School, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea
  • Juwan Kim Korea University Business School, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea
  • Dongcheol Kim Korea University Business School, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea
There has been a debate as to whether accounting information quality priced on asset returns and systematically affects the cost of capital of firms in the world market. In this paper, we examine whether there is a relationship between accounting information quality proxied by accruals quality in the Korean markets, and whether it does affect the cost of capital. Although accruals quality is linked with some variables representing the uncertainty of future cash flows and thus it could be a good proxy for a risk, we find no evidence, unlike in the U.S, that this risk is systematically priced in stock returns and it does affect the cost of capital in Korea. Specifically, after controlling for the factors affecting the cost of debt and the cost of equity, we find that the proxy variable for accounting information quality has no significant relation with the cost of debt and the cost of equity. In particular, there is a flat relation between average stock returns and accruals quality. We also provide another perspective in examining whether accounting information quality affects the cost of equity capital. If accounting information quality affects the cost of equity, as accounting information quality becomes poorer, investors would require a greater risk premium associated with the well-know risk factor such as firm size, book-to-market, and price momentum. However, we find no evidence supporting this.

  • Ok-Hwa Ahan
  • Juwan Kim
  • Dongcheol Kim
There has been a debate as to whether accounting information quality priced on asset returns and systematically affects the cost of capital of firms in the world market. In this paper, we examine whether there is a relationship between accounting information quality proxied by accruals quality in the Korean markets, and whether it does affect the cost of capital. Although accruals quality is linked with some variables representing the uncertainty of future cash flows and thus it could be a good proxy for a risk, we find no evidence, unlike in the U.S, that this risk is systematically priced in stock returns and it does affect the cost of capital in Korea. Specifically, after controlling for the factors affecting the cost of debt and the cost of equity, we find that the proxy variable for accounting information quality has no significant relation with the cost of debt and the cost of equity. In particular, there is a flat relation between average stock returns and accruals quality. We also provide another perspective in examining whether accounting information quality affects the cost of equity capital. If accounting information quality affects the cost of equity, as accounting information quality becomes poorer, investors would require a greater risk premium associated with the well-know risk factor such as firm size, book-to-market, and price momentum. However, we find no evidence supporting this.
Accounting information quality,Accruals quality,Risk premium,Cost of capital,Risk factor models