LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

A Permanent and Transitory Component of Individual Stock Return Volatility

  • Hyo-young Lee
  • Jin-wan Cho
This study considers component GARCH model to decompose the stock return volatility into permanent and transitory component and compute the firm¡¯s the ratio of permanent component of volatility to total volatility. With this ratio as a dependent variable and the firm-characteristic variables as explanatory variables, we use the linear multivariate regression analysis to capture the features of 100 constituent and outside firms of the S&P 500 index respectively in the US market between April 1998 and April 2002. This study discovers that size and the book-tomarket ratio appear to be important factors explaining the firm¡¯s ratio of permanent component of volatility to total volatility. We find that the firm size is negatively related while the book-to-market ratio of the firm is positively related to the permanent component of volatility out of total volatility of the firm¡¯s stock return.

  • Hyo-young Lee
  • Jin-wan Cho
This study considers component GARCH model to decompose the stock return volatility into permanent and transitory component and compute the firm¡¯s the ratio of permanent component of volatility to total volatility. With this ratio as a dependent variable and the firm-characteristic variables as explanatory variables, we use the linear multivariate regression analysis to capture the features of 100 constituent and outside firms of the S&P 500 index respectively in the US market between April 1998 and April 2002. This study discovers that size and the book-tomarket ratio appear to be important factors explaining the firm¡¯s ratio of permanent component of volatility to total volatility. We find that the firm size is negatively related while the book-to-market ratio of the firm is positively related to the permanent component of volatility out of total volatility of the firm¡¯s stock return.