LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

±¹³» Æݵå½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ ÅõÀÚÁÖüº° Æݵ弱Á¤´É·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

  • À¯½Ã¿ë Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ °æ¿µÇаú
  • Ȳ½Â±Ô Çѱ¹Áõ±Ç±ÝÀ¶
º» ¿¬±¸´Â Gruber(1996)¿Í Zheng(1999)ÀÌ Á¦½ÃÇÑ ÆݵåÅõÀÚÀÚÀÇ Æݵ弱Á¤´É·Â, Áï ½º¸¶Æ® ¸Ó´Ï È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±¹³»½ÃÀåÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Keswani and Stolin(2008)ÀÇ ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý·ÐÀ» »ç¿ë ÇÏ¿© ½ÇÁõ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú¸¦ ¿ä¾àÇϸé ù°, ºÐ¼®±â°£ Áß °³ÀÎÅõÀÚÀÚÀÇ ÀÚ±ÝÁõ°¡À² ÀÌ ±â°üÅõÀÚÀÚº¸´Ù Å©¸ç °³ÀÎÅõÀÚÀÚ¿Í ±â°üÅõÀÚÀÚ°£ÀÇ ÀÚ±ÝÈ帧ÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â ¸Å¿ì ³· ´Ù. µÑ°, ±¹³» ÆݵåÅõÀÚÀÚ´Â ½º¸¶Æ®ÇÏ´Ù´Â ½º¸¶Æ®¸Ó´Ï È¿°ú(smart money effect)ÀÇ Á¸Àç ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Áõ°Å¸¦ ¹ß°ßÇÏÁö ¸øÇß´Ù. ¼Â°, ÆݵåÅõÀÚÀÚÀÇ Æݵ弱Á¤´É·ÂÀÇ Á¤µµ¸¦ ºÐ¼® ÇÏ¸é ½ÃÀå¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀαâÆݵ尡 ºñÀαâÆݵ庸´Ù ¿ÀÈ÷·Á ¼º°ú°¡ ÀúÁ¶ÇÏ´Ù. ³Ý°, Zheng(1999) ÀÇ Á¤º¸È¿°ú(information effects)¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ÆݵåÀÚ±ÝÈ帧Á¤º¸¸¦ È°¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿ªÀÇ Á¤º¸ È¿°ú°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¸ç ´Ù¼¸Â°, Æݵå±Ô¸ðÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¸é °³ÀÎÅõÀÚÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì »ó´ëÀûÀÎ ¼º°ú ºñ±³¿¡¼­ ´ëÇüÆݵåÀÇ ¼º°ú°¡ ¼ÒÇüÆݵ庸´Ù ¿ì¼öÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÀÇÀÇ´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù: ù°, ÆݵåÀÚ±ÝÈ帧ÀÇ µÎ °¡Áö ÃøÁ¤¹æ¹ý, Áï Æݵ庰 ¼ø ÀÚ»ê°ú ¼öÀÍ·ü¿¡ ±âÃÊÇÑ ³»ÀçÀû ÃøÁ¤¹æ¹ý°ú Æݵ庰 Á÷Á¢ ÃøÁ¤¹æ¹ýÀ» ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ °, °³ÀÎÅõÀÚÀÚ(°ø¸ðÆݵå)¸¸ÀÇ ±âÁ¸¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ±â°üÅõÀÚ°¡±îÁö ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®À» ½ÃµµÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, Æݵå¸ÅÀÔ°ú ȯ¸Å¸¦ ÀϺ° µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© º¸´Ù Á¤±³ÇÏ°Ô ÀÚ±ÝÈ帧À» »êÃâÇÏ¿© ½º¸¶Æ®¸Ó´Ï È¿°ú¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
ÆݵåÀÚ±ÝÈ帧,Æݵ弱Á¤´É·Â,½º¸¶Æ®¸Ó´ÏÈ¿°ú,Á¤º¸È¿°ú,¼º°úÆò°¡¸ðÇü

Is Money Smart in the Korean mutual fund marketplace?



In this paper, we examined the smart money issue with Korean mutual fund data. The smart money hypothesis states that investor money is "smart" enough to flow to funds that will outperform in the future, that is, that investors have genuine fund selection ability. Gruber(1996), Zheng(1999) and Keswani and Stolin(2008) document that indeed investors make good decisions, that is, money is "smart". However Sapp and Tiwari(2004) find that this "smart money" effect no longer holds after controlling for stock return momentum. To examine the smart money controversy, we employ a Korean data set(January 2001 to May 2008) of monthly fund inflows and outflows differentiated between individual and institutional investors. Our data allow us to conduct a stronger test for the smart monet effect by using monthly data on exact fund flows, and to gain greater insight into investors' decisions by considering separately the buys and sells of individual and institutional investors. Using Carhart(1997)'s four-factors model and Keswani and Stolin(2008)'s methodology, we analyze empirical relationship between fund's risk-adjusted excess return and fund flows. The results are we can't find such evidences of smart money effect in Korean mutual fund marketplace. But the result from the trading strategies confirms adverse Zheng(1999)'s information effect, that is, investors can beat the market by investing in negative money flow, low money flow and large funds.
funds' money flow,fund selection ability,smart money effect,information effect,fund performance model.