LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

Corporate Taxes and Securitization

  • JoongHo Han KDI School of Public Policy and Management
  • Kwangwoo Park Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
  • George Pennacchi University of Illino
This paper highlights how corporate income taxes create incentives for banks to securitize loans. Most banks are subject to corporate income taxation while special purpose corporations that hold securitized loans are not. We present a model that analyzes different banks¡¯ securitization incentives. The model shows that if a bank has significant loan origination opportunities but limited deposit market power, its incentive to sell loans is an increasing function of its corporate income tax rate. Empirical tests of the model¡¯s predictions are carried out on two different samples of U.S. commercial banks¡¯ loan sales during the period 2001 to 2008: one sample using Call Report data and the other sample based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) filings. Consistent with the model¡¯s predictions, both sets of data show that banks having relatively high lending opportunities are more likely to sell mortgages and non-mortgage loans when they operate in states that impose higher corporate income taxes. An implication is that corporate taxation of bank income may have contributed to the recently excessive growth in securitization.

  • JoongHo Han
  • Kwangwoo Park
  • George Pennacchi
This paper highlights how corporate income taxes create incentives for banks to securitize loans. Most banks are subject to corporate income taxation while special purpose corporations that hold securitized loans are not. We present a model that analyzes different banks¡¯ securitization incentives. The model shows that if a bank has significant loan origination opportunities but limited deposit market power, its incentive to sell loans is an increasing function of its corporate income tax rate. Empirical tests of the model¡¯s predictions are carried out on two different samples of U.S. commercial banks¡¯ loan sales during the period 2001 to 2008: one sample using Call Report data and the other sample based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) filings. Consistent with the model¡¯s predictions, both sets of data show that banks having relatively high lending opportunities are more likely to sell mortgages and non-mortgage loans when they operate in states that impose higher corporate income taxes. An implication is that corporate taxation of bank income may have contributed to the recently excessive growth in securitization.