LOG IN⠴ݱâ

  • ȸ¿ø´ÔÀÇ ¾ÆÀ̵ð¿Í Æнº¿öµå¸¦ ÀÔ·ÂÇØ ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
  • ȸ¿øÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï½Ã¸é ¾Æ·¡ [ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ]À» ´­·¯ ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇØÁֽñ⠹ٶø´Ï´Ù.

¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀúÀå

   

¾ÆÀ̵ð Áߺ¹°Ë»ç⠴ݱâ

HONGGIDONG ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ È¸¿ø ¾ÆÀ̵ð ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

E-mail Áߺ¹È®ÀÎ⠴ݱâ

honggildong@naver.com ˼
»ç¿ë °¡´ÉÇÑ E-mail ÁÖ¼Ò ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¿ìÆí¹øÈ£ °Ë»ö⠴ݱâ

°Ë»ö

SEARCH⠴ݱâ

ºñ¹Ð¹øÈ£ ã±â

¾ÆÀ̵ð

¼º¸í

E-mail

ÇмúÀÚ·á °Ë»ö

ÁÖ½Ä ½ÃÀå°ú ÁÖ½ÄÇü ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü ¹× Çö±ÝÈ帧ÀÇ µ¿ÅÂÀû °ü°è : °³º° ÆÝµå ºÐ¼®

  • °í±¤¼ö ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °æ¿µ´ëÇÐ
  • ¹é¹Ì¿¬ ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³
  • ÇÏ¿¬Á¤ ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³
º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±¸Á¶Çü º¤ÅÍ ÀÚ±âȸ±Í ¸ðÇü(SVAR: Structural VAR)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÃÀå ¹× °³º° ÁÖ½ÄÇü ÆÝ µå Á¤º¸ÀÇ µ¿ÅÂÀû °ü°è¸¦ °ËÁõÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¸Á¶Çü º¤ÅÍ ÀÚ±âȸ±Í ¸ðÇüÀÇ ½Äº° ¹®Á¦¸¦ ±âÁ¸ ¿¬±¸¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇÏ¿© Á¦¾àÇÑ ÀÌÈÄ, ½ÃÀå º¯µ¿¼º, ½ÃÀå ¼öÀÍ·ü, ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü, Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧ÀÇ °ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °° ´Ù. ù°, 4 º¯¼ö °£ÀÇ °ü°è¿¡¼­ µ¿½ÃÀûÀÎ È¿°ú°¡ Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ¿´´Âµ¥, ½ÃÀå º¯µ¿¼ºÀº ½ÃÀå ¼öÀÍ·ü°ú ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü¿¡ µ¿½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î À½(-)ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ½ÃÀå ¼öÀÍ·üÀº ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü¿¡ ¾ç(+)ÀÇ ¿µÇâ, Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧¿¡ À½(-)ÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÀûÀÎ È¿°ú°¡ ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿´´Ù. µÑ°, ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü°ú Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧 °ü°è ¿¡¼­´Â °³º° Æݵ庰·Î µ¿½ÃÀûÀÎ È¿°ú°¡ ´Þ¶óÁüÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼Â°, ºÐ»ê ºÐÇظ¦ ÅëÇØ Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧À» ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â º¯¼ö°¡ ÀÏ¹Ý ÁÖ½ÄÇü Æݵå¿Í KOSPI200 À妽ºÇü Æݵ忡¼­ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖÀ½À» º¸¿© ÁÖ¾ú´Âµ¥, KOSPI200 À妽ºÇü Æݵå´Â ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·üÀÌ Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧À» ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â ÁÖ¿ä º¯¼öÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ³Ý °, °¡¼³ °ËÁõÀ» ÅëÇØ 4 º¯¼ö °£ µ¿½ÃÀû °ü°è°¡ ¸Å¿ì Áß¿äÇÏ°Ô ÀÛ¿ëÇÏ°í, ½ÃÂ÷ È¿°ú´Â °ÅÀÇ ¾øÀ½À» º¸¿© µ¿½ÃÀûÀÎ È¿°ú¸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ ±¸Á¶Çü º¤ÅÍ ÀÚ±âȸ±Í ¸ðÇüÀÌ º¯¼ö °£ °ü°è¸¦ ¼³¸íÇϴµ¥ ÀûÀýÇÔÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´ ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ±âÁ¸ ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ ³ª¾Æ°¡ ½ÃÀå ¹× Æݵå Á¤º¸¸¦ ¸ðµÎ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â 4 º¯¼ö ±¸Á¶Çü º¤ÅÍ ÀÚ±âȸ±Í ¸ðÇüÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© µ¿ÅÂÀû °ü°è¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´°í, °úµµ ½Äº°¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °¡¼³ °ËÁõÀ¸·Î º¯¼ö°£ µ¿½ÃÀû °ü°èÀÇ Áß ¿ä¼ºÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù´Â Á¡¿¡¼­ Àǹ̰¡ ÀÖ´Ù.
±¸Á¶Çü º¤ÅÍ ÀÚ±âȸ±Í ¸ðÇü,µ¿ÅÂÀû °ü°è,½ÃÀå Á¤º¸,ÆÝµå ¼öÀÍ·ü,Æݵå Çö±ÝÈ帧

The Dynamic effects of market information and equity fund returns and flows : Individual fund level analysis

  • Kwangsoo Ko
  • Miyoun Paek
  • Yeonjeong Ha
Using a structural vector auto-regression (SVAR) model, this study examines the dynamic relationships among market volatility, market return, fund return, and fund cash flow on the individual fund level. The major empirical findings are as follows: First, contemporaneous effects among endogenous variables are very important for explaining the dynamic behavior of each endogenous variable. In the concurrent month, market volatility has statistically significant negative effects on both market return and fund return while merket return generally has a negative effect on fund cash flow. Second, the directions of the relationships between fund return and fund cash flow are not determinate in sign. Third, variance decomposition shows that fund return is most important for explaining fund cash flow in KOSPI200 index funds, not in aggressive equity funds. Finally, hypothesis tests by over-identification re-confirm the appropriateness of the SVAR to explain the dynamic relationships among market volatility, market return, fund return, and fund cash flow. This study contributes to the extant literature in the sense that the findings stress the importance of concurrent relationships.
Structural VAR,Dynamic effects,Market information,Fund returns,Fund flows